A Deep Dive Into the Regulatory Requirements for Bitcoin Companies

Like this? Share it.TwitterFacebookGoogle+LinkedInReddittumblrbufferEmail

Marco Santori is a senior associate at New York-based Nesenoff & Miltenberg, LLP, and very familiar with the nuances of Bitcoin regulation. In a presentation at the Inside Bitcoins conference in Las Vegas, Mr. Santori provided a thorough overview of money transmission regulation on the federal and state levels.

Money services businesses (MSBs) are regulated by FinCEN, whose goal is to prevent money laundering.

MSBs are required to register with FinCEN on a federal level. While it’s a free, online process to register, there are an assortment of requirements, such as:

  • Collect, verify, record report customer information
  • Check identities against watch lists (terrorists, criminal, enemies of the state)
  • Deny service for some customers
  • Sometimes secretly report transaction activitiy to fincen and continue servicing the customer
  • Undergo yearly audits

Bitcoins Political Donations

In March 2013 FinCEN published regulatory guidance surrounding Bitcoin. While this guidance left some confused, the overall takeaway was that Bitcoin is not inherently illegal and Bitcoin companies are fine to operate as long as they comply with applicable laws.

Santori provided examples of businesses that would be under the veil of regulation:

  • Hosted wallets that permit exporting private keys
  • Paper wallets
  • Exchange digital currency for government currency
  • Exchange one digital currency for another
  • Mine digital currency and convert to government currency
  • Accept value from person A and give to person B
  • Accept value from person A and give to person A at another time or place

While it’s easy to register on the federal level, it’s another story on the state level. There are 48 states that provide licenses for money transmission. The states regulate money transmitters separately from the federal government. So, for a company to operate in the United States, they need to separately attain 48 licenses, which is a timely and costly endeavor.

While it’s more complex to apply for licenses in 48 states, the scope of regulation appears to be slightly less cumbersome. The states have not adopted all of FinCEN’s categories of money transmitter. Specifically, only these two categories are relevant:

  • Accept value from person A and give to person B
  • Accept value from person A and give to person A at another time or place

Given the ambiguity and cost of regulation, what should a startup do?

Circle Internet Financial, a company formed by serial entrepreneur Jeremy Allaire, publicly stated that they will be seeking licenses in all states and raised $9 million in venture capital to fund that initiative.

However, there are a plethora of startups that don’t have the funds or capabilities to attain licenses. Here are some other options.

First, a company could send a “no action” or “request for ruling” letter, which explains the nature of the business and why it should not require a license. Drafting this letter can be costly due to legal fees but can also result in certainty if authorities respond.

There are also avoidance strategies. You can incorporate overseas and geofilter IP addresses to block US customers. By documenting this process and having appropriate policies in place, a company can protect themselves from regulatory backlash if some US customers get through. For example, a company should check if the customer registers a US bank account, makes transfers to US accounts or subsequently accesses the company’s service from US IP addresses.

Santori said that most companies restructure their companies to either fit into an exception in the regulation. Exceptions include:

  • Providing network services to a money transmitter
  • White label exchange
  • Physically transporting value that substitutes for currency
  • Operating a settlement business between MSBs
  • Performing payment processing services

If a company wants to get a state license, how long does it take to get approved? For a regular business, just a few weeks. But for a Bitcoin business, it’s not clear.

Like this? Share it.TwitterFacebookGoogle+LinkedInReddittumblrbufferEmail

2 Responses to A Deep Dive Into the Regulatory Requirements for Bitcoin Companies

  1. […] A Deep Dive Into the Regulatory Requirements for Bitcoin Companies    A Deep Dive Into the Regulatory Requirements for Bitcoin […]

  2. […] A Deep Dive Into the Regulatory Requirements for Bitcoin Companies    A Deep Dive Into the Regulatory Requirements for Bitcoin […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>